UUIDs instead of LABELs
I remember to have already read someone experiencing this, so maybe this is a duplicate.
The issue is that by loading drives using
LABEL instead of
UUID it's impossible to be certain which drive will be loaded, for example when builds from different days of the same month are deployed on multiple disks attached to the computer.
Since we already use datetime
UUIDs, my proposal is to replace
UUIDs wherever we use them for drive selection.
Different buildmodes (
keys) can then have predictable
UUIDs based on
Included in !217 (closed)