Commit f773ac8f authored by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Browse files

smack: Guard smack_ipv6_lock definition within a SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING block

The mutex smack_ipv6_lock is only used with the SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING
block but its definition is outside of the block. This leads to a
defined-but-not-used warning on PREEMPT_RT.

Moving smack_ipv6_lock down to the block where it is used where it used
raises the question why is smk_ipv6_port_list read if nothing is added
to it.
Turns out, only smk_ipv6_port_check() is using it outside of an ifdef
SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING block. However two of three caller invoke
smk_ipv6_port_check() from a ifdef block and only one is using
__is_defined() macro which requires the function and smk_ipv6_port_list
to be around.

Put the lock and list inside an ifdef SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING block to
avoid the warning regarding unused mutex. Extend the ifdef-block to also
cover smk_ipv6_port_check(). Make smack_socket_connect() use ifdef
instead of __is_defined() to avoid complains about missing function.

Cc: Casey Schaufler <>
Cc: James Morris <>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <>
parent da7ce72c
......@@ -51,8 +51,10 @@
#define SMK_SENDING 2
static DEFINE_MUTEX(smack_ipv6_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(smk_ipv6_port_list);
struct kmem_cache *smack_rule_cache;
int smack_enabled;
......@@ -2603,7 +2605,6 @@ static void smk_ipv6_port_label(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *address)
* smk_ipv6_port_check - check Smack port access
......@@ -2666,6 +2667,7 @@ static int smk_ipv6_port_check(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_in6 *address,
return smk_ipv6_check(skp, object, address, act);
* smack_inode_setsecurity - set smack xattrs
......@@ -2852,8 +2854,9 @@ static int smack_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *sap,
rc = smk_ipv6_check(ssp->smk_out, rsp, sip,
if (__is_defined(SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING))
rc = smk_ipv6_port_check(sock->sk, sip, SMK_CONNECTING);
return rc;
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment