RFC: meson support
still WIP in a few places, but an initial draft is ready
Notes:
might not be able to ship pre-rendered manpages with this (worth looking into further):manversion:
macro does nothing (in the current and proposed versions)I am attempting to keep everything runnable without meson, see e.g.MESON_PROCESSED
macrorunning tests/coverage in meson proves a bit elusive. do we want to just keep that as a makefile thing? (same question for dist tarball generation)- currently have parity with the arch package in installed files/dirs/perms
fixes #128
closes !386 (closed)
closes !387 (closed)
Edited by classabbyamp