The members of the new_utsname structure are defined with magic numbers
that *should* correspond to the constant __NEW_UTS_LEN+1.  Everywhere
else, code assumes this and uses the constant, so this patch makes the
structure match.

Originally suggested by Serge here:

https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-March/016258.html



Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>